About — The Union Report
About this publication

EU law shapes daily life.
Most people never see it coming.

The Union Report is an independent publication dedicated to tracking, explaining, and contextualising the regulatory output of the European Union, including the regulations, directives, decisions, and legislative proposals published in the Official Journal and EUR-Lex that govern how businesses, institutions, and individuals operate across the bloc.


The European Union produces a continuous stream of binding and non-binding acts that touch nearly every area of economic and social life, from data protection and financial services to environmental standards, pharmaceutical approval, and labour rights. These acts are consequential, most often than not technically dense, and frequently opaque. Most of them receive little or no coverage in mainstream media, yet they carry compliance obligations, rights, and obligations and shape the lives of millions in Europe and abroad.

There is nevertheless, a well-documented distance between EU institutional output and the people it affects. The language employed in the official acts is formal, the procedures are complex, and the sheer volume of material published in the Official Journal makes systematic tracking a professional undertaking. The Union Report exists to close that distance. Our aim is to make the EU's regulatory record legible to anyone who needs, or simply wants to understand it, not just those with the resources to navigate it professionally.

We cover what the institutions actually produce: the acts themselves, the case law that interprets them, the consultations that precede them, and the proposals moving through the legislative pipeline. While sometimes it will inevitably seep through, we do not focus on covering EU politics in the general sense, geopolitical commentary, or institutional gossip. If it is not in EUR-Lex, the Official Journal, or any other official EU platform, it is probably not here.


01
Independence
Coverage decisions are made without commercial influence. We do not accept paid placement within our editorial content. Any commercial arrangements, such as sponsored segments or commissioned briefings, are clearly labelled and kept structurally separate from our reporting.
02
Transparency
We have no institutional affiliation and no political alignment. Where EU acts are contested, be it politically, legally, or in their implementation; we say so, and we present competing positions without taking sides. We cite our sources and link to primary texts on every article we draft.
03
Accessibility
Legal and regulatory language exists to be precise, not to be impenetrable. Our goal is to explain what EU acts actually say, what they require, and what they mean in practice, in plain language, without sacrificing accuracy or depth, with most of our production being free to access.

Our scope is the legislative and regulatory output of the EU institutions, including acts published in the Official Journal, case law from the Court of Justice and the General Court, open consultations on the Commission's Have Your Say portal, and legislative proposals moving through the ordinary or special legislative procedure. Do note, that this journal's objective is purely informational, and nothing here constitutes legal or financial advice.

Editorial scope at a glance
Within scope
Regulations, directives, and decisions published in the Official Journal
Judgments of the Court of Justice and the General Court
Legislative proposals under the ordinary and special legislative procedure
Commission implementing and delegated acts
Public consultations and calls for evidence
Non-binding acts: recommendations, opinions, guidelines
Outside scope
General EU political news and institutional commentary
Geopolitical analysis or foreign policy opinion
National legislation not derived from EU acts
Market analysis or investment advice
Content not traceable to EUR-Lex or the Official Journal

EU regulatory acts are rarely politically neutral. They reflect choices about how to balance competing interests, be it between market efficiency and consumer protection, between harmonisation and subsidiarity, between innovation and precaution. We believe that acknowledging this complexity is a precondition for honest reporting, but not an obstacle to it.

Where we note that an act is contested, we present the competing positions as accurately as we can. We do not editorially advocate for particular regulatory outcomes, and we do not allow commercial considerations to shape which acts we cover or how we describe them. Our analysis is our own, and so is the responsibility for our errors.

The Union Report is written and edited independently, without institutional affiliation. Our coverage draws exclusively on primary sources published by the EU institutions, such as the Official Journal, EUR-Lex, and the Commission's Have Your Say portal, supplemented by case law from the Court of Justice of the European Union,also published in EUR-Lex and linked within the articles that refer to them.

Questions, feedback, or commercial enquiries: Contact Us →